My current writing project is Maelstrom, a political novel about the Civil War. To a great extent, Maelstrom is a sequel to Tempest at Dawn, my novelization about the Constitutional Convention. The Civil War tested the tensile strength of the Framers work. Although both books stand alone, they share style and structure and many of the Framers descendants make brief appearances.
I’m reading stacks of books to get alternative perspectives on the players and events. One is The Impending Crisis in The South written in 1857 by Hinton Rowan Helper. Nothing like getting the skinny from someone who actually lived in the period.
Helper begins his book with startling statistics. He
compares the economies of slave and non-slave states at the time of the Framing of the Constitution to just prior to the Civil War. Here are some of his statistics
comparing New York and Virginia.
New
York Virginia
1790 Population 340,120 748,308
1850 population 3,097,661 1,421,661
1791 Exports $2,505,465 $3,130,865
1852 Exports $87,484456 $2,724,657
He didn’t have 1790 numbers for some economic indicators but provided contemporaneous comparisons for imports, manufacturing, real and
personal property, and farms.
New
York Virginia
1853 Imports $178,270,999 $399,004
1850 Manufacturing $237,597,249 $29,705,387
1850 Property (Incl. slaves) $1,080,309,216 $391,646,438
1850 Farms $576,631,568 $223,423,315
Helper then compares Massachusetts versus North
Carolina and Pennsylvania versus South Carolina. The results are similar. North
and South Carolina in the lead at the time of the Constitutional Convention and
the woefully behind by mid-nineteenth century.
For the six states Helper examines, slaveholding states were
far stronger in 1787 than their northern counterparts, but after sixty
years, the free states explosive growth had left the South far behind. It was
like the South was in a footrace wearing concrete boots. Hinton Helper, a
southerner, identifies that concrete as slavery.
The political implications are interesting. The South was
controlled by a single party, and they retained power by keeping the general
populous uneducated, poor, and dependent. Upward mobility? Almost unknown. Income
disparity was of feudal dimensions, social norms insisted on conformity, and politicians
and the press constantly demonized the North while telling the lower classes
that they lived in a morally superior society.
Here’s a thought; that same political party wields ironclad
control over our largest cities with income disparity, poor education, and dependency
the order of the day. Sure seems like that party is using the same strategy to retain full and absolute power.
No comments:
Post a Comment