“That to
secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed.” —Declaration of Independence
In 1776,
upstart colonists penned the most revolutionary document in history. The Declaration of Independence flipped the
world upside down, and the Divine Right of Kings suddenly became the consent of
the governed. The individual was now the one endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable rights. This was a world-shattering concept.
Like most
revolutionary visions, this one didn't suddenly spring onto the world stage. John
Locke, David Hume, Adam Smith, and Thomas Paine were among many who advocated
that consent of the governed was dictated by the laws of nature and of nature’s
God. Not everyone accepted this concept, of course—certainly not King George
III or the English nobility.
The
Founders, however, were steeped in this incendiary idea. Self-governance had
been part of their experience in the New World. The colonists were subjects of
England, but a round-trip sail across the great Atlantic put three to four
months between them and their king. Self-rule started the Pilgrims. The
Mayflower Compact began by pledging loyalty to King James, but then went on to
decree that the colonists would “combine together into a civil body politick,
for our better ordering and preservation, and furtherance of the ends aforesaid:
and by virtue hereof do enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws,
ordinances, acts, constitutions, and officers, from time to time, as shall be
thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony.”
Basically, the Mayflower Compact was a written statement declaring
self-government in colonial America.
Geography may have allowed the early colonists to govern themselves, but it was the writings of the Enlightenment that reminded them that self-rule was a natural right. This grand notion eventually led to the Declaration of Independence, which asserted that it was the right of the people “to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” This founding principle basically said that the people themselves held the power to form a new government at any time and in any shape that met their needs. It was a radical concept used to justify radical action.
The initial
exercise in self-government at a national level did not work well. The Articles
of Confederation were too weak. The fatal flaw in the Articles was that it
formed a government that represented states instead of people, and any state
could veto crucial collective action. In 1787, a convention met in Philadelphia
“for the sole and express purpose of revising the articles of confederation,
and reporting to Congress and the several legislatures, such alterations and
provisions therein as shall when agreed to in Congress, and confirmed by the
States, render the federal constitution, adequate to the exigencies of
government and the preservation of the union.”
The
convention was supposed to recommend changes to the Articles of Confederation,
and submit them to Congress and the state legislatures for approval. The delegates
wrote an entirely new constitution—one that dissolved the existing national
government. How would they get this thing approved? It threatened every
entrenched political figure in the country. James Madison had an idea. All
power emanates from the people, so neither Congress nor the state legislatures
had the authority to approve a new government. In “Federalist No. 46,” he
wrote, “The ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides
in the people alone.” To legitimatize their work, they needed to bypass
Congress and the state legislatures and go directly to the people. This was the
reason that the ratification conventions were independent of the state
legislatures and Congress.
A national
debate erupted that included newspaper articles, sermons,
competing pamphlets, and ratification conventions. It wasn't the Constitutional
Convention, Congress, or the state legislatures that made the Constitution a
binding contract between the people and their government; it was ratification
conventions and the surrounding debates that occurred in churches, taverns, and
on street corners.
The United
States Constitution reads, “We the People … do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America.” It is not a small matter that
our Constitution starts with the words We the People in out-sized letters. The
entire document is the people’s document—a written contract wherein the people
delegate specific authority to a national government.
Today, some
people think the Constitution made the national government supreme. Others
believe the national government is a creature of the states. The Founders were never confused. They knew in their hearts that
governments derived their just powers from the consent of the governed. Period.
No comments:
Post a Comment