The Trent Affair claims historians pay the Affair short shrift, then promises to deliver new revelations about this diplomatic incident. The books primary value is quoting first source letters, newspaper articles, and official documentation. It is always useful to read first source material, but those presented do not provide a different perspective than historians have depicted. Granted, historians gloss over the nuts and bolts of the Affair, but it’s because the issue was resolved before it could impact the course of the conflict.
What if the Trent Affair hadn’t been agreeably settled. If
Great Britain had entered the war on the Confederacy’s side, it was likely that
the South would have won. That would have made the Trent Affair a huge deal. Jefferson
Davis’s top diplomatic priority was to drag a European power into combat.
Abraham Lincoln’s top diplomatic priority was to deny the Confederate States of
America recognition by European powers. This book did not provide additional
insights on how Lincoln outsmarted Davis. As you study the Affair, there are
hints of backroom bartering but no evidence. When desired, Lincoln was fairly astute
at maneuvering without leaving fingerprints.
This is an odd little book with poor transitions and scant narrative
about quoted material. The photographs of the major participants are well known.
In the end, the book added little understanding to this diplomatic fiasco. A
pity because handled differently, the Trent Affair could have been the linchpin
to the entire conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment