“The infant periods of most nations are buried in silence, or veiled in fable, and perhaps the world has lost little it should regret. But the origins of the American Republic contain lessons of which posterity ought not to be deprived.” —James Madison
Showing posts with label #JamesMadison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #JamesMadison. Show all posts
Monday, September 18, 2017
Happy Birthday ... You don't Look a Day Over 230
Congress made an error. I believe our elected
representatives should have chosen June 21. On that date, New Hampshire became
the ninth state to ratify the Constitution, making it the "supreme law of
the land." I believe James Madison would concur. Delegate signatures were
important, but only as a milestone. Legitimacy depended not on esteemed
delegates, but on ratification by conventions of the people. After all, it's
our name that appears first, and in bold, outsized characters. So, as we go
about our busy day, let's take a moment to celebrate
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Primer on Electoral College
The Electoral College is an integral element of our
governing system. The purpose is to give people who live in all the states some
influence on the executive leadership of the country. After the recent election,
many are questioning the wisdom of Article II, Section 1. The Electoral College
is immensely important not only to who wins, but how presidential campaigns are
run. Eliminate the Electoral College and the interior will never see another
candidate in their state and heartland primaries will be meaningless.
Inhabitants of the hinterlands often feel dismissed by urbanites
living along one of the two coasts. Unfortunately for our country, the hue and
cry to do away with the Electoral College confirms their worst suspicions. Abolishing the Electoral College will
disenfranchise every American who lives in fly-over country.
Here is a good primer on the Elector College.
Labels:
#AlexanderHamilton,
#constitution,
#democracy,
#economy,
#electoralCollege,
#freedom,
#GOP,
#government,
#government theory,
#history,
#JamesMadison,
#liberty,
#Republicans,
#rights
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
Do readers judge a book by its title?
Everyone knows the old axiom that people judge a book by its cover, but do they also judge books by their title? I don’t know. I suspect a great title can get readers to look further, a horrible title stops further inspection, and a mediocre title doesn't influence sales one way or the other.
The Great Rehearsal might be the worst title I've encountered for a great book. Carl Van Doren wrote one of the top three history books on the Constitutional Convention. (In this amateur historian's humble opinion.)The book was published in 1948, when the United Nations was just starting up and Van Doren thought the 1787 Constitutional Convention was a rehearsal for writing the UN charter. This was a poor title that must have dampened sales of a fine history book. Ironic, since the book never mentions current events except in a slapped together preface.
I still like the title. Perhaps I should have agonized more over my other titles. The Steve Dancy titles: The Shopkeeper, Leadville, Murder at Thumb Butte, The Return, Jenny's Revenge, and Crossing the Animas are pedestrian. I like The Shout Mouth Society because it connotes secret society intrigue, which properly reflects the plot of this contemporary novel. Principled Action is a lousy title and may have affected sales of this nonfiction book about the founding period.
The Barnes and Noble Book Blog posted an article “12 Books With The Most Irresistible Titles.” Good Titles, but I always liked Lonesome Dove because it sounded intriguing.
The Great Rehearsal might be the worst title I've encountered for a great book. Carl Van Doren wrote one of the top three history books on the Constitutional Convention. (In this amateur historian's humble opinion.)The book was published in 1948, when the United Nations was just starting up and Van Doren thought the 1787 Constitutional Convention was a rehearsal for writing the UN charter. This was a poor title that must have dampened sales of a fine history book. Ironic, since the book never mentions current events except in a slapped together preface.
I've never agonized over my own titles, except for Tempest at Dawn, my own book on the Constitutional Convention. Since this was a novelization of the convention, I needed a title that didn't sound like a history book. I also liked the idea that the title reflected the turmoil in the infant country at the time of the convention.
I still like the title. Perhaps I should have agonized more over my other titles. The Steve Dancy titles: The Shopkeeper, Leadville, Murder at Thumb Butte, The Return, Jenny's Revenge, and Crossing the Animas are pedestrian. I like The Shout Mouth Society because it connotes secret society intrigue, which properly reflects the plot of this contemporary novel. Principled Action is a lousy title and may have affected sales of this nonfiction book about the founding period.
Authors may not be the best at selecting titles, but I’m not sure focus-group driven editors are better. My title for my computer technology book was Dinosaurs and Whippersnappers, but Wiley insisted on The Digital Organization. I still prefer my title.
![]() |
| Honest stories filled with dishonest characters. |
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Historical Novels Need a Fictional Title
Coming up with a good book title is difficult. Ideally, you want the title that will grab a buyer’s attention in three or so words. The title is actually only half of a selling partnership. The cover and title work together to entice a purchase. People do judge a book by its cover. The cover entails an image with a few words, and if either appears incongruent, buyers move on to the next offering.
My favorite is Tempest at Dawn. Since the book is a dramatization of the Constitutional Convention, I wanted a title that sounded like a novel, not a nonfiction history book. The cover design put the title in context: a stormy sky over the Pennsylvania State House flying a thirteen star flag. For me, the title evoked a troubled nation at its founding, but some criticized the title as unrelated to the story. I still like it.
In my Western series, I wanted the sub-title prominent to remind readers that there were more Steve Dancy Tales, so I chose simple titles that included:
The covers are black and white because I wanted a design that indicated that these were a different type of Western: different from books with loud, colorful cover illustrations showing action or looming violence. The series has been very successful, so hopefully this is partly due to the covers and titles because I intend to continue the pattern for the remaining books in the series.
Tuesday, December 1, 2015
Can Words On Parchment Constrain Executive Overreach?
“Governments
are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed.”
The
Declaration of Independence used these words to legitimize our founding as a
nation. Fifteen simple words, but they embodied a world-shattering idea. Kings
supposedly derived their authority from God, but the Declaration declared that
“all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.” These subversive words flipped the divine right of kings on its
head. Instead of kings, God endowed all of mankind with natural rights.
Words can be
powerful.
That is,
unless they’re ignored. The Constitution is the “supreme law of the land,” but
many don’t accept that enumerated powers limit government action. Elected
officials “solemnly swear … to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of
the United States,” but many view the words as cant uttered during a
swearing-in ritual. Lesser laws are based on a reasonable man’s interpretation
of the language, but many regard the “supreme law of the land” as a living
document that can mean whatever we need it to mean on any particular day.
Thursday, November 19, 2015
A Tale of Serendipity
I took historical accuracy seriously when I wrote Tempest at Dawn. I not only read dozens of
books about the Constitutional Convention, but studied books on Eighteen Century
lifestyle and technology; Philadelphia, New York, and New Haven; the
international scene; and numerous biographies of the principle Framers of the
Constitution. I also made numerous visits to New Haven, New York, Mount Vernon, Montpelier, and
Philadelphia as part of my research.
The events and locations outside of the State House were as
accurate as I could portray them. Two major venues in the book were the Indian
Queen and City Tavern. (City Tavern remains intact, but alas, the Indian Queen
is long gone.) In my penchant for accuracy, I tried to lodge the delegates in
the appropriate Inns, homes, and taverns, but I couldn’t find where Roger
Sherman stayed during the convention. After looking at every source I could
find, I finally decided I would need to make something up. He was not rich, so
he would probably stay at a boarding house. I used my wife’s maiden name and
put him in a room at Mrs. Marshall’s boarding house. This was a fictional
contrivance, but not my only one. I left my other protagonist, James Madison,
at the upscale Indian Queen for the duration of the convention when he actually
moved elsewhere at some point for privacy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





